Subscribe to The Informer for monthly expert analysis, and to Events for advance notice of visiting world leaders and distinguished guests.
You may unsubscribe from Lowy Institute newsletters at any time. For information on our privacy practices and how to unsubscribe, see our Privacy Policy.

Caught upstream: Saving Indonesia’s dying textile industry
The bankruptcy of PT Sri Rejeki Isman, better known as Sritex, marked the end of Southeast Asia’s largest vertically integrated textile manufacturer. After the Supreme Court rejected the company’s final appeal in December 2024, operations ceased in March 2025, leaving over 10,000 workers jobless.
Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, Sritex was a champion of Indonesia’s industry, with a revenue of US$1.3 billion at its peak in 2019. Competitive pressures and falling demand brought the decline of the Sukoharjo, Central Java-based textile giant, slashing revenue down to just US$325 million by 2023, while debts reached $1.6 billion.
To add insult to injury, two brothers at the helm of PT Sritex, Iwan Setiawan Lukminto and Iwan Kurniawan Lukminto, are standing trial for allegedly causing Rp 1.35 trillion ($81 million) in state losses through a corruption scheme involving credit facilities. Both men objected to the charges.
The fall of Sritex reflects a structural problem in Indonesia’s industry: scale does not always improve competitiveness, and policies that shield upstream industries can eventually lead to more job losses than gains.
Many blame the influx of Chinese imports. China is the largest textiles exporter to Indonesia, accounting for around half of all imports. In response, Jakarta has introduced numerous import restrictions on textiles since 2019. In July 2025, after the bankruptcy of Sritex, the government once again responded with technical considerations (PerTek) requiring Industry Ministry’s approval for textile imports, undoing an earlier liberalization. Active safeguard mechanisms now cover important inputs such as cotton yarn, fabrics and synthetic fiber yarn.
Protectionism has failed to stabilize the sector. The very firms these measures were designed to protect continue to shut down, while downstream garment manufacturers face rising costs that weaken their standing in global markets. This leaves the industry squeezed on both ends.
The situation in nearby Vietnam could not be more different. Despite having comparable wage levels to Indonesia, its downstream garment makers continued to increase their share of the global market, supported by access to cheaper imported inputs from China.
About the authors
Ahmed Albayrak
Ahmed Albayrak is a Research Associate in the Lowy Institute’s Indo-Pacific Development Centre.
Hilman Palaon
Dr Hilman Palaon is a Research Fellow at the Lowy Institute’s Indo-Pacific Development Centre. His work focuses on digital economy issues in the Indo-Pacific region, including financial inclusion, economic empowerment, and technology innovation.