Subscribe to The Informer for monthly expert analysis, and to Events for advance notice of visiting world leaders and distinguished guests.
You may unsubscribe from Lowy Institute newsletters at any time. For information on our privacy practices and how to unsubscribe, see our Privacy Policy.
The most-pressing world events explained by Lowy Institute experts and global contributors, in your inbox, every Wednesday.
You may unsubscribe from The Interpreter at any time. For information on our privacy practices and how to unsubscribe, see our Privacy Policy.
Pacific Islands, explained.

Solomon Islands has relatively small police force (Julia Whitwell/Defence Department)
In a country where trust in the police is already fragile, bringing in more weapons won’t help.
About the author
Sheridan Ward
Sheridan Ward is a researcher on non-militarisation and countries without sovereign military institutions.
Solomon Islands is one of 26 nations in the world without a standing military. Yet the Pacific nation is also one of only two non-militarised countries – alongside Haití – to experience armed conflict. Solomon Islands offers a cautionary tale of the risks that gun importation can bring, and the value of pursuing disarmament as a tool for promoting peace.
Holding caches of weaponry in the country can be fraught with risk. During the period known as “The Tensions” from 1998–2003, stolen weapons raided from police armouries contributed significantly to the escalation of armed violence between the Malaita Eagle Force (MEF) and the Isatabu Freedom Movement (IFM).
Several raids were illustrative of the danger.
The inability of the government to secure its weapons raised significant concerns for the domestic population.
While these raids were not the only source of arms, the inability of the government to secure its weapons raised significant concerns for the domestic population. Under RAMSI, the regional peacekeeping mission deployed in 2003, Operation Helpem Fren called for a nationwide guns amnesty, and saw 3,730 guns handed in and publicly destroyed, including 700 high-powered military-style weapons, along with more than 300,000 rounds of ammunition. This demonstrated RAMSI’s commitment to reducing the prevalence of guns in Solomon Islands. The country has been largely successful in maintaining low rates of gun violence since.

Sawing a surrendered gun in half (Brian Hartigan/RAMSI Gallery)
However, decisions to reintroduce guns into Solomon Islands over recent years have raised concerns about the possibility of renewed gun violence in the country. This includes the 2017 decision to rearm the police following the withdrawal of RAMSI, the 2022 donations of 95 replica rifles and 92 replica pistols by China and 60 MK18 rifles by Australia, as well as recurring allegations that the Chinese replica gun shipment contained real weapons. While each of these instances have involved a relatively low number of guns entering the country, a public outcry has ensued.
Arguments in favour of arming the police in Solomon Islands focus on the need to maintain order without need for foreign assistance. A better approach would be to focus on expanding the police and their linkages to the community. Solomon Islands has relatively small police force, especially in comparison to other non-militarised states. The global average police-to-civilian ratio is approximately three police per 1,000 civilians. However, with only 1,500 police officers to a population estimated at 758,000, the Solomon Islands sits well below this global average, with 1.98 police officers per 1,000 civilians, and has the second lowest ratio in the Pacific region after Papua New Guinea.
Given the limited resources in Solomon Islands for training officers, efforts should focus on expanding the police force through community engagement and community policing, connectivity with chiefs, and non-violent dispute resolution mechanisms. Focus on training in firearms is unlikely to bolster trust in and support for the police and is more likely to remind people of the role of the police and paramilitary in enabling the raids and the impact that weaponry had on the tensions. The memory of these events at the turn of the century still linger, so arming the police and supporting the importation of weapons risks further damaging trust.