China alone buys 38% of Australia’s exports. That’s a staggering concentration risk – and one made worse by Beijing’s slowing economy, faltering property sector, and strategic diversification of supply. At the same time, Washington’s protectionist tilt means that even Australia’s closest security partner is putting its own industries first. Australia risks being stranded between two superpowers whose economic agendas rapidly diverge from its own interests.
Brazil and Australia share strikingly similar challenges: both are resource-rich economies seeking to pivot from extraction to innovation. Brazil’s focus on biofuels, sustainable agriculture, and forest-based industries complements Australia’s emphasis on renewables and green manufacturing.
Australia possesses some of the world’s best renewable endowments – abundant sunlight, wind, and land – enough to power both domestic industries and clean exports across the Indo-Pacific. The challenge isn’t resources but building the industrial ecosystem around them: renewable energy precincts, green industrial hubs, and export pathways for hydrogen, ammonia and low-carbon materials.
For both hosts, strategic partnerships across the Global South will be critical. Demand from countries in Latin America and Southeast Asia for sustainable energy and infrastructure is surging. If Brazil and Australia position themselves as partners of choice – providing technology, investment, and reliable clean supply – they can lock in decades of regional integration and economic security.
While the headlines often focus on solar panels and hydrogen, middle powers have another card to play: the circular economy.
Closing material loops, reusing resources, and extending product lifecycles all boost economic complexity. Brazil’s expertise in bio-based materials and waste-to-energy systems, combined with Australia’s advances in materials science and recycling, could define a new wave of “green manufacturing” leadership.
In battery technology, for example, production is dominated by global giants. But recycling and refurbishment remain open territory. With their combined industrial capacity and policy frameworks, Brazil and Australia could lead in battery life extension and critical minerals recovery — a niche that’s both environmentally and strategically valuable.
Policy clarity and strategic turning points
If COP30 and COP31 are to succeed as turning points for middle powers, they must be backed by pragmatic and forward-looking policies. That means:
- Industrial policy that builds economic complexity in clean technologies, critical minerals processing, and sustainable manufacturing.
- Investment frameworks with clear taxonomies to attract and de-risk global green capital.
- Trade diversification to deepen ties across East Asia, Europe, and the Global South.
- Skills and innovation programs to cultivate the workforce and intellectual property needed to compete in high-value supply chains.
Middle powers now have opportunities to pick the race they want to run – and make sure they’re not running behind, but setting the pace. COP30 and COP31 will be critical moments to make this shift.