Research by the ASEAN Institute for Peace and Reconciliation (2025) identifies three main challenges. First, institutional and structural factors such as limited access to training, education, combat experience, and the absence of strong affirmative policies continue to hold women back. Second, cultural expectations still frame the military as a male-dominated space. Third, gender-based violence and harassment remain a serious concern.
These issues are not just abstract – they show up in everyday practices. For instance, during army officer candidate school, female personnel were reportedly placed in barracks located farther from classrooms than their male counterparts, requiring longer travel times each day. While it remains unclear whether this arrangement still exists, it nevertheless illustrates how institutional design has not always fully accounted for equality. At the same time, there have been longstanding controversies surrounding the recruitment, including that female applicants were once subjected to intrusive and discriminatory “virginity test” as part of the selection process – practices widely criticised for violating dignity and which have since been abolished. Although reforms have been introduced, these examples highlight how gender bias can be deeply embedded within institutional structures.
Bringing more women into the military is one thing. Ensuring they have equal access to strategic roles and decision-making positions is another. Without that, increasing numbers alone will not lead to meaningful change.
The experience of Susan Coyle shows that leadership does not happen overnight. It is built over time through deliberate career development. Before becoming chief of army, she will have held various key roles – from leading ADF operations in the Middle East to overseeing cyber and space capabilities. This kind of structured pathway is essential if more women are to rise to leadership positions.
For Indonesia, the way forward does not have to be drastic, but it does have to be intentional. A clear and realistic blueprint is needed, one that supports the recruitment, career progression, and access to strategic roles for women within the TNI.
A gradual approach is perfectly fine. Progress does not need to happen all at once. Moving slowly but consistently is far better than not moving at all.
In the end, this is not just about fairness. It is about strengthening the TNI itself. A more diverse leadership structure brings broader perspectives, which is increasingly important in dealing with complex security challenges.
Indonesia may not be at the same level as Australia and some of its regional peers. But with sustained commitment, there is no reason it cannot get there. And when that happens, it will not just be a milestone for women – it will be a strengthening of the institution itself.