If we stopped here, we would be telling only half the story. Some women in Upper Highlands communities choose to align themselves with hiremen, and enter these relationships voluntarily. A relationship with a powerful gunman provides protection – for herself, her brothers and her clan’s land. Such a partnership was described by one person we interviewed as “a great and positive contribution from the tribe to the hireman”. Sometimes the hireman takes his new wife – and children if there are any – back to his village when he leaves and cares for them there. Sometimes he will build a separate house for his wife and be responsible for her and their children’s welfare in her own village.
Voluntary union and coerced exchange therefore coexist in the same villages, sometimes in the same households. Distinguishing between the two can be difficult but recognising that both are present is necessary.
But the structural fact does not budge. In the most violent provinces of PNG, women’s bodies are part of the payment system that keeps the arms economy moving.
A similar combination of vulnerability and sexual exploitation operates at the displaced end of the cycle. According to IDMC's Global Report on Internal Displacement 2025, around 84,000 people live in displacement across the country as result of conflict and violence, and most have been doing so for long periods. Women and girls in displaced communities are often at risk of opportunistic abduction and sexual violence – a vulnerability that follows from the destruction of the kin networks that would otherwise protect them. The clan structures that constrain men’s behaviour at home have no purchase in a host community a hundred kilometres away. One interviewee from Hela said “the husbands and brothers of the victims find themselves powerless to protest or to challenge the perpetrators”. He also noted how the victims lack security and resources to access justice. Another person from Enga stated:
“I have seen a lot of these experiences in the recent fight in Wapenamanda. Wives being raped, girls been taken as wives by the hosting tribes.”
Sometimes, young girls are married off early in order to “keep them away” from perpetrators.Sometimes the transaction is even more brutal: one interviewee said, “their daughters are given in marriage for exchange of the land where they stay or the resources they use.”
This pattern is not a secret, but it is not publicly spoken about either. Victims and their families can neither resist it nor talk about it, unless someone is badly assaulted or killed. While international agencies have well-established gender-based violence programming for responding to emergencies, this specific phenomenon is rarely identified explicitly. The closest reference we could find was an Oxfam observation from 2014 about the experience of displaced women in Hela province, noting that “their dependence on their hosts … added to risks of displaced women being subjected to violence and abuse by their hosts.” Without naming what is happening, responses – where they occur – will remain reactive rather than preventative.
Just as with the use of women to pay for guns and mercenaries, quantitative evidence about the extent of these abuses is lacking. But it is something that needs to be spoken about and urgently addressed.
Three things should follow. Women should be acknowledged and included as real and meaningful parties to peace agreements, not as mere observers. The need to protect against sexual exploitation should be recognised as a fundamental component of displacement programming that responds to conflict. And primary fieldwork should be commissioned to measure how widespread these practices are and what effective mechanisms can prevent them.