Subscribe to The Informer for monthly expert analysis, and to Events for advance notice of visiting world leaders and distinguished guests.
You may unsubscribe from Lowy Institute newsletters at any time. For information on our privacy practices and how to unsubscribe, see our Privacy Policy.
The most-pressing world events explained by Lowy Institute experts and global contributors, in your inbox, every Wednesday.
You may unsubscribe from The Interpreter at any time. For information on our privacy practices and how to unsubscribe, see our Privacy Policy.
Diplomacy, explained.

Vladimir Smirnov\TASS via Getty Images
Here’s how Scott Morrison might have responded to China’s online provocation.
About the author
Damien Spry
Damien Spry is a lecturer in media and communications at the University of South Australia.
With a wicked and now infamous tweet, Australia has joined India, the US, Canada, and the Pope on a list of those China’s “wolf warrior” diplomat in chief Zhao Lijian has deliberately provoked. By reacting with fury we’ve done what a troll would hope.
Internet trolling referred originally not to beasts under bridges but to a fishing term – to cast a line and entice prey to hook themselves. By demanding an apology from the Chinese government and saying they should be ashamed, we’ve taken the bait.
Those suggesting this is a misstep by China argue it diminishes their international standing. Well, China is not seeking anyone’s approval anymore. And this is not a mistake – it’s a strategic use of communication. It won’t be the last time.
To not respond is unthinkable – the image Zhao tweeted is appalling – but Australia’s reaction could have been different.
Damien Spry