Although we continue to struggle with our fair share of problems, including inequality and racism in some quarters, contemporary Australia is more open and inclusive than many other countries. Reflecting this pattern, Australian diplomats mostly get on well with a diverse range of people, in part because we generally don’t have tickets on ourselves and are curious about the outside world. Small things bear this out. Our ambassadors and high commissioners tend to have more modest residences and do not carry their official titles into retirement, unlike, say, the Americans.
Yet one of my British friends told me that she found some of her Australian interlocutors to be more formal than expected. This could be true at times. Some Australian diplomats might be more careful about minding their Ps and Qs around the British to avoid any resemblance with Sir Les Patterson, the obnoxious Australian cultural attaché created by the comedian Barry Humphries.
Mind you, my friend also thought Australian diplomats at their best were “ruthlessly focused on the national interest and not afraid to pursue it”, even to the extent of “occasionally pissing off an ally”. All in all, she thought we were excellent partners.
Australian diplomats typically don’t beat around the bush, don’t like bullshit and don’t thump tables. We are often straight-talking and unlikely to play games. Other people usually know where they stand with us.
One Asian diplomat told me he found his Australian counterparts plain-speaking to the point of being blunt, “calling a spade a ‘bloody shovel’ and belabouring a point”. He added, though, that he had found Australians were loyal and stuck with you when they had made up their minds to do so. My New Zealand opposite number during one posting observed that Australians were brasher than Kiwis, which is true enough.
Despite the relative informality, Australian diplomats do not take the job lightly. We pride ourselves on being well prepared, methodical and practical, thinking laterally and flexibly. We have a strong sense of ethics, but proceed with a good dose of pragmatism as well. We generally aren’t ideological. We usually come to the table to find a solution and solve a problem. Not all countries do so. Some cause trouble, almost with relish.