Even when housing is available by offering more money than usual, the vetting process is often opaque and discriminatory. Newcomers are routinely overlooked because they can’t present long-term employment contracts, local references, or upfront payments that wealthier applicants can afford. And even when successful, most tenancy contracts are months or years long, meaning landlords implement prices rise with a lag. That is the reason that even though the rate of inflation in other goods and services may have come down, rental inflation has not.
The result is not just inconvenience, it’s precarity, homelessness, and humiliation. Rental properties occupied by international students in a non-pandemic year are estimated to amount to about seven per cent, yet foreigners and migrants were blamed over the past year in the lead up to the recent election for inflating the Australian housing market.
For international students and young workers, two of the groups most recruited through Australia’s migration and education policies, the lack of harmony is jarring. Many of those drawn in by the diplomatic narratives of inclusivity find themselves priced out of housing. The cost of a visa might be paid up front, but the emotional, social, and financial cost becomes clear only after arrival.
This is not just a housing policy failure. It is a reputational one. In a digital age where personal stories spread globally, the reality experienced by newcomers directly shapes Australia’s image internationally. When talented individuals are met not with inclusion but exclusion, they take that story with them. It reverberates through future student cohorts, migration flows, and foreign policy perceptions.
Australia’s reputation abroad rests on the lived experiences of those who come here seeking a better life, not on ads or migration brochures. That experience is not welcoming right now. To maintain its standing as a fair, forward-thinking nation, housing must be treated as a basic amenity, not a privilege of those already established.